- Apr 20, 2012
- 6,320
- 0
- 0
Isnt that a little dramatic? For instance, you come here to defend that great ABP, you defend it in the papers, maybe even on tv, just like McQuaid. Yet that great ABP failed to flag a certain dopeTex? 'Hell, it must be the software' is then the response. Who can say this software didnt 'de-flag' other riders?JV1973 said:You guys are right. They all dope. *******s. And I'm a ******* too.
You won.
ok, since victory has been achieved, a round of back patting is in order.
Someday I can only pray to have the insight, intelligence, and clarity of the victors.
well done.
You go 'full ***' on hardcore Ricco, yet this doper stayed within the believable realms of human performance, a point you make time and time again. 'Oh 5,93/5,97/6.01w/kg, that is within the believable'. Why should we believe that now? Tour 2009, infusion kits found at Astana, ABP did not flag any rider there did it? A thirty-eight-years old grandpa flying up mountains with the best, making a mockery out of the sport, yet, the heralded Anne Gripper has stated she believes/believed Armstrong was clean in 2009 saying 'there was nothing in his test results when she was at the UCI to suggest abnormal blood values.'
But, now, with less testing et all, cycling is supposed to be much cleaner? All the dodgy dottores have packed their bags or suddenly stopped poisoning the riders and the grand public?
Please forgive me when I have problems believing this. If that makes me a man that loved cycling and now is suspicious, so be it.
Donkeys turning into racehorses was bad and still is bad.not more than to convince a few people that used to love cycling that it isnt so bad these days. thats it. it also helps me more fully form my ideas and arguments.
Little drama queenish, dont you think?CONGRATS W#*nk*rs !
There are much more teams, just watch the spring Classics, it is gonna be fun.Right now Team Sky is making the sport look terrible. It does not matter if the team's riders are not doping.