We'll see how it goes in the 2 remaining stages. But at this point, Landa is impressive, I think he can improve much more for the Tour.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Very dissapointing stage, Landa should be already 3 minutes ahead of the group
Landa wants to make sure his old leader doesn’t OTL.Very dissapointing stage, Landa should be already 3 minutes ahead of the group
At the moment he is on the group, I wanted to be him on the break, but maybe is not still the good one...Some people as Sosa, Elissonde or Cristian Rodriguez droped, so the pace is highLanda wants to make sure his old leader doesn’t OTL.
Lot of people can beat Pogacar in a hard day with long climbs.Yeah, this clearly isn't one of those days where he could beat Pogačar.
For Mikel is better for the team to keep the pressure off by sticking to the original plan with remco as the main guy. Landa will be stronger with this approachIt seems he took it a bit easier the last stages and use them for building his form. Is it not better that he is co-leader instead of only supporting Remco? Landa has definitely the potential to finish top5, which I'm not sure for Remco.
And also the fact that he's not the designated leader for the GT, less pressure for him and we know how good he can be.Looking really good int he presentation. Hoping for a safe tour and maybe even some successes. Landismo viveeeee
He lost 2:05 to Remco last year in the Vuelta ITT. That was 0.5km longer than stage 7 but much flatter.I wonder how he will perform in the ITT on stage 7. He will most likely lose time to the top 7 riders on GC, but it will be great if he limit his losses or 1:15/1:30 to the likes of Remco/Pogacar
My thoughts too, could have helped Evenepoel gain more time on a podium threat but Landa was feeling generousI don't get why he closed the gap for Rogla. Why not sit on his wheel when he was losing contact?
1. Trying to do his best in gc in case Remco faltersI don't get why he closed the gap for Rogla. Why not sit on his wheel when he was losing contact?
It's only stage 4 and on the last km of Galibier, I doubt that Roglic would have lost alot of time if Landa stayed on Roglic's wheel instead of bridging the gap. It's better that SOQ still have Remco & Landa in contention for the podium.My thoughts too, could have helped Evenepoel gain more time on a podium threat but Landa was feeling generous
Roglic was struggling at that point with no guarantee he is able to pull back a two rider gap and burns himself out faster. By potentially killing Roglic they increase their podium chance.It's only stage 4 and on the last km of Galibier, I doubt that Roglic would have lost alot of time if Landa stayed on Roglic's wheel instead of bridging the gap. It's better that SOQ still have Remco & Landa in contention for the podium.
Rogla dropped back from Pogi's wheel to last in the group 3.5 km from the top.It's only stage 4 and on the last km of Galibier, I doubt that Roglic would have lost alot of time if Landa stayed on Roglic's wheel instead of bridging the gap. It's better that SOQ still have Remco & Landa in contention for the podium.