Freddythefrog said:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=192&v=pw4_Gk36_ik Shows the UCI using the device and getting a 0 all over the bike. the Stade 2 video showed us that the edge of the tablet was not where the static magnetic field was but it was about 5 cm down from the top edge and at 90° to the plane they were using. What the UCI video showed us was that Barfield and the idiot using the device in the UCI video had not got a clue what they were doing.
Barfield also lied to us to tell us that the tablet had been used to detect the single proven case. This is false. The facts are that MULTIPLE RIDERS COMPLAINED TO THE UCI STATING THAT FEMKE HAD A BIKE WITH A MOTOR IN IT AT THE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS AND HAD USED IT IN PREVIOUS RACES. THE RESPONSE WAS SPRECIPITATED BY INTELLEGENCE PROVIDED BY FELLOW COMPETITORS.
That this snake oil salesman choses to lie about this case and steal false crdit for the totally ineffective use of the tablet, tells you where we are with this.
Exactly this. So the true detection rate of the UCI's technical fraud tests are 0/40,000. This is either :
A. the most effective crime prevention procedure in the history of mankind, or,
B. the most effective example of money-wasting security theatre since the creation of the TSA.
Hands up who thinks the UCI is capable of getting anything absolutely perfectly right from Day 1 without any teething problems whatsoever?
Hands up who thinks it is more likely that in the seven years since Cancellara's, er, 'magical' 2010 performances, the financial incentives to use motors are as compelling as ever while technology has improved dramatically?
You can only pick one.