• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Official Thread: Stage 17 Bourg-Saint-Maurice to Le Grand-Bornand

Page 22 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Jul 22, 2009
3,355
1
0
Visit site
klodifan said:
Here's the thing. AC didn't have to do anything but sit on wheels. By attacking and widening the gap between Klodi and Armstrong, he has made his teammates work for a podium spot that much more difficult. Sure LA and AK may make up some time in the ITT, but then there is Saturday that is advantage Schlecks. Dumb.

Kloden used up an enormous amount of energy trying to pull himself over the top after he was put in the limit. This move by his teammate puts the podium positions in serious jeopardy for the team that has tried to serve him.
 
Jun 29, 2009
117
2
0
Visit site
scribe said:
Kloden used up an enormous amount of energy trying to pull himself over the top after he was put in the limit. This move by his teammate puts the podium positions in serious jeopardy for the team that has tried to serve him.

Klodi's podium chances are gone.

Final GC:

1. AC
2. AS
3. LA
 
sometriguy said:
I could be wrong... but my guess is if he attacked on the bottom it would look a lot like what happend sastre today

Could be. We saw how he was able to respond to the Shreks' initial attack, but that sapped him so he could not respond to the two of the one two punch. He then faded.

We have not seen anything that suggests that Armstrong can climb with the Schlecks or Contador when it is steep and they drop the hammer.
 
Jul 22, 2009
3,355
1
0
Visit site
BroDeal said:
Could be. We saw how he was able to respond to the Shreks' initial attack, but that sapped him so he could not respond to the two of the one two punch. He then faded.

We have not seen anything that suggests that Armstrong can climb with the Schlecks or Contador when it is steep and they drop the hammer.

I don't think Armstrong will ride off. Not with the yellow jersey in the group. An accident or complete bonk in the yellow jersey might require Armstrong's assistence. Look for Armstrong to take a big bite out of the Shreks tomorrow, and for him to stay on their wheel up Ventoux for a podium placement.
 
May 26, 2009
502
0
0
Visit site
BroDeal said:
Could be. We saw how he was able to respond to the Shreks' initial attack, but that sapped him so he could not respond to the two of the one two punch. He then faded.

We have not seen anything that suggests that Armstrong can climb with the Schlecks or Contador when it is steep and they drop the hammer.

Ventoux is totally different to today's stage. Actually we haven't seen anything like that in this year's Tour. I'd say it's more like Verbier but the 18K lenght will make it much harder. The 10% gradients at the start of the climb won't suit him and I would guess that A.Schleck and Contador ride away from the others with maybe Nibali hanging close. I bet Armstrong will come in about 2mins off the pace.
 
Mar 10, 2009
7,268
1
0
Visit site
The Ventoux doesn't favour a solo attack, usually there is too much wind. I assume the Schlecks will want to recapture some of the time they are bound to lose in the TT. Perhaps a Schleck/Contador lead group with an attack close to the last 1-2k?
 
RdBiker said:
Ventoux is totally different to today's stage. Actually we haven't seen anything like that in this year's Tour. I'd say it's more like Verbier but the 18K lenght will make it much harder. The 10% gradients at the start of the climb won't suit him and I would guess that A.Schleck and Contador ride away from the others with maybe Nibali hanging close. I bet Armstrong will come in about 2mins off the pace.

I am not sure about Armstrong being that far off the pace. He has looked stronger. I have a feeling that after the TT, Contador will be so far up on every one, Lance will be free.

What i mean is that Lance first attempted to bridge up to the group on the Romme, but he had to stop his attack due to Wiggins being on his wheel. At that time, Wiggins was still consider a threat to the overall because he was only 2 minutes down with a TT to come. On Saturday, Wiggins will be best case scenario within 3 minutes of Alberto, so if Lance needs to get across, it won't matter if Wiggins comes with him, because he is not a threat anymore to the Yellow. In fact, after the TT, I think that Contador's main goal is to stick to wheels and nothing else.
 
Apr 24, 2009
206
0
0
Visit site
Alpe d'Huez said:
Not enough mountain stages, and that TTT was twice as long as it needed to be.

Lance may get free reign from his team on Astana, but I don't see him being strong enough to get away, and stay away.

Agree with the latter, but I don't understand the complaints that you and others have made about the length of the TTT


2009: 39 Km

2004: 65 Km

2003: 69 Km

2002: 67.5 Km

2001: 67 Km

2000: 70 Km

The 2009 version was 43% shorter than the length of the average TTT during the preceding decade.

It seemed to me that, as a tradeoff for going with actual time differences, the organizers specifically set out to drastically shorten the course in order to attempt to keep times gaps reasonable. The plan may not have worked, but I don't see how anyone can claim about the length of this yrs TTT compared to the traditional distance for that stage.
 
Azdak6 said:
Agree with the latter, but I don't understand the complaints that you and others have made about the length of the TTT


2009: 39 Km

2004: 65 Km

2003: 69 Km

2002: 67.5 Km

2001: 67 Km

2000: 70 Km

The 2009 version was 43% shorter than the length of the average TTT during the preceding decade.

It seemed to me that, as a tradeoff for going with actual time differences, the organizers specifically set out to drastically shorten the course in order to attempt to keep times gaps reasonable. The plan may not have worked, but I don't see how anyone can claim about the length of this yrs TTT compared to the traditional distance for that stage.

Notice the correlation between TTTs and team/one rider domination :p
 
Parrot23 said:
Agree on both counts.
On latter, people must still think he's doped to his eyeballs? :D Physics says he can do it on one stage (watts/kg), experience/pedigree says not on consecutive ones. He's clean.
Again, 1,2,3 on podium for one team not good for cycling. Shades of Mapei. It's done by team, not individual.

More shades of Gweiss, I was thinking.

Recovery is a wonderful thing, is it not?


Disappointed in Saxo's goal. Someone said on here, before the Tour even started, that Riis would have them riding for 2nd and so it is.
Clearly, their aim, today, was to give them a shot at the bottom two rungs of the podium.

All very tepid. This Tour could have been raced with less than 10 teams.

For me, this will be another year to forget.
How long to the Giro?
 
Jul 22, 2009
68
0
0
Visit site
So you're complaining about the one team who has been attacking? The rest of the field is wheel-hugging TTers. Sad situation, really - but hardly the fault of the saxos. This has been a year to forget as all tours with one supreme rider riding on the strongest team has been a year to forget. YOu cant like many editions of the tour de france.
 
Apr 20, 2009
121
0
0
Visit site
RdBiker said:
Ventoux is totally different to today's stage. Actually we haven't seen anything like that in this year's Tour. I'd say it's more like Verbier but the 18K lenght will make it much harder. The 10% gradients at the start of the climb won't suit him and I would guess that A.Schleck and Contador ride away from the others with maybe Nibali hanging close. I bet Armstrong will come in about 2mins off the pace.

I agree with you that Armstrong will lose time but for a different reason. He seems strong enough to ride with any lead group but his ability to respond to fast accelerations or a quick change in pace is lacking. Given the ability to attack back he likely would have gotten back to the lead group today and to Schleck on the Verbier. But he is not allowed to respond. Meaning he will get dropped on Ventoux and have to ride behind a slow group and lose 2-5 minutes of time. Tomorrow should be a much better gaugue of how strong he is.
 

iceaxe

BANNED
Jul 10, 2009
72
0
0
Visit site
The american spectators should have pushed Contador and schlecks off their bikes. Lance has earned the right to his 8th tour win. God bless america.
 
May 12, 2009
207
0
0
Visit site
Not a good move by Contador to attack. Kloden may have been struggling, but that's still no reason to go. They were still putting time into Wiggins, which was the main objective. Possibly Astana could have swept the podium, but I think AS is in there now.
As far as the finish goes, I'd imagine JB said don't lose any time, but I'd be very surprised if he asked Contador to try and win. That's pretty much how it looked like it worked out to me.

Unless Wiggins has a miraculous recovery, he's probably done for a podium spot. He won't put much time into LA tomorrow, and maybe not into Kloden. He's too far behind Schleck, who will probably put time back into him on Ventoux.

Most likely podium:
1. AC
2. AS
3. LA
 
Jun 20, 2009
54
0
0
Visit site
I've given Contadope the benefit of the doubt until today. He is truly a pompous little ***. I hope he tests positive for dope as he just proved he is the biggest dope in the tour.
 
A

Anonymous

Guest
still think brad will get 3rd :p

AC
Baby-S
Wiggo
Kloden
Lance
Frank
 
May 13, 2009
692
1
0
Visit site
skippy254 said:
I've given Contadope the benefit of the doubt until today. He is truly a pompous little ***. I hope he tests positive for dope as he just proved he is the biggest dope in the tour.

How do you like them, grapes?...Sour..:D
 

TRENDING THREADS