• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Race Thread

Page 150 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Apparently only 22 times a different rider was able to win, when both Van Aert and Van der Poel were at the start of a race. And i'm guessing most of those 22 come from their first 1-2 seasons at the pros.

Absolutely no point in MVDP and WVA going all out right from the start, but I love it. Poor Pidcock though, this is a course where he should be able to at least follow their wheel...
Pidcock may be best of the rest, but the difference between him and Sweeck/Vantourenhout/... is much much smaller than it is to Van Aert and Van der Poel. It's a shame for him, and not surprising, but it does show his WCC title is really just a result of them not being there.
 
Of course he was on the limit, Van Aert was as well. What do you expect?
They weren't on the limit all the time, or they would have won by 2 minutes. The point is that these technical errors usually only pop up with Mathieu when he is physically pushed to the limit. It being in the same spot before the finish shows at what point he was actively trying to drop Van Aert and that it was Mathieu more than Wout who didn't want to let it come to a sprint. Even though i think in a 1v1 he has about as much chance to win a sprint as Wout.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: lemon cheese cake
They weren't on the limit all the time, or they would have won by 2 minutes. The point is that these technical errors usually only pop up with Mathieu when he is physically pushed to the limit. It being in the same spot before the finish shows at what point he was actively trying to drop Van Aert and that it was Mathieu more than Wout who didn't want to let it come to a sprint. Even though i think in a 1v1 he has about as much chances to win a sprint as Wout.
I don't think MVDP is afraid of WVA in a 1v1 sprint, tbh. In a bunch sprint it's obviously different, but MVDP has the more explosive kick. He didn't get to show it today though. Which goes to show why he wants to avoid a sprint if he has the choice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eeslliw
I don't think MVDP is afraid of WVA in a 1v1 sprint, tbh. In a bunch sprint it's obviously different, but MVDP has the more explosive kick. He didn't get to show it today though. Which goes to show why he wants to avoid a sprint if he has the choice.
I agree, but if he didn't try to drop Van Aert at that point, he even could have let Van Aert hit that section first, and he would have been able to sprint in Wout's wheel. He had the choice between trying to drop Van Aert (which was nearly impossible there), or letting Van Aert take that section first (which meant he would be in the best position for the sprint). Of course, because he made that error, he did wind up in Van Aert's wheel for the sprint but that was unforeseen.
 
This is not "sore loser" because I was already thinking about it before the race, but I think Zolder needs some changes to the course because it's getting too repetitive and a lot of races in the past have been decided in the same part of the track due to a rider mistake which opens up a gap in the last climb that it's not closed until the end.

I didn't watch many Zolder races before 2016 but I think the course chosen for that WCH is superior to this one in the way they use the final section. And don't know it's true or not but looking at the race footage it seems like the sandy descent which leads up to the stairs is becoming easier each year. Those stairs also seem easier to do than the previous run-up without stairs.
 
This is not "sore loser" because I was already thinking about it before the race, but I think Zolder needs some changes to the course because it's getting too repetitive and a lot of races in the past have been decided in the same part of the track due to a rider mistake which opens up a gap in the last climb that it's not closed until the end.

I didn't watch many Zolder races before 2016 but I think the course chosen for that WCH is superior to this one in the way they use the final section. And don't know it's true or not but looking at the race footage it seems like the sandy descent which leads up to the stairs is becoming easier each year. Those stairs also seem easier to do than the previous run-up without stairs.
I think the biggest issue is the fences that naturally are there to restrict entry and exit into the racing circuit. With the worlds being the biggest race of the season and probably having more spectators than the Christmas race (which admittedly attracts large amount of fans) they added more bridges than just the one they had at the time that linked the bank's with the start finish straight to help spectators get around. Similarly, I think you'd have to add a few bridges to the course if you wanted to change the order or direction of sections, or add completely new bits.

I think since having the wooded section at the end is a welcome addition that came around the time of the 2016 world champs although that ran the other way round with the final drop being a sandy climb and the bumpy downhill that immediately proceeds it being a steep draggy climb (or runup when it rained for the world's).

The stairs have definitely been changed to be more uniform when they were reintroduced as before it was more of a scramble
 
  • Like
Reactions: postmanhat
Just because we got a great race doesn't mean you can't make improvements to a course; I think it's been in it's current layout for 5-6 seasons now. There are always ways to make things better.

I think since having the wooded section at the end is a welcome addition that came around the time of the 2016 world champs although that ran the other way round with the final drop being a sandy climb and the bumpy downhill that immediately proceeds it being a steep draggy climb (or runup when it rained for the world's).

I've just watched some of the 2016 Worlds.....I wouldn't mind seeing them try that layout again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lemon cheese cake
Apparently only 22 times a different rider was able to win, when both Van Aert and Van der Poel were at the start of a race. And i'm guessing most of those 22 come from their first 1-2 seasons at the pros.


Pidcock may be best of the rest, but the difference between him and Sweeck/Vantourenhout/... is much much smaller than it is to Van Aert and Van der Poel. It's a shame for him, and not surprising, but it does show his WCC title is really just a result of them not being there.
Completely agree about his WC title, but the first part is just incorrect since he came back from training camp. Both him and Van De Haar had poor starts today and MVDP was gone towing WVA within the first couple of minutes.

Am going to against what seems to be the consensus and say both races were relatively boring, as they usually are at Zolder for me. There's a place for courses where miniscule mistakes on the few technical sections cost you a couple of metres and so the race, But I'd stop watching cross if they were all like this.
 
Last edited:

TRENDING THREADS