Tom Danielson

Page 10 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
I'd have much harsher words for the dude is he flourished while I rode domestically...

Would love to see how their bank accounts differ as a result of Danielson's cheating and wins.

“Danielson and I turned pro the same year,” said Ben Jacques-Maynes, the veteran Jamis-Hagens Berman rider, just prior to stage 1. “You can see the massive difference in our career trajectories from 2002. Having said that, we now know why there’s a trajectory difference.

Read more at http://velonews.competitor.com/2015/08/news/riders-react-to-danielson-news_380381#sj7dJUClI654rPti.99
 
Re: Re:

DirtyWorks said:
Kennf1 said:
MacRoadie said:
TheMight said:
Fearless Greg Lemond said:
Didn't Scott Moninger make a pretty convincing case that he had some contaminated supplements? He still sat out but had some independent testing show his supplements had a contamination in them. now whether or not that happens with testosterone is a good question...

Scott's positive was 13 years ago (2002). You'd sorta hope that we wouldn't still be talking about guys "accidentally" ingesting something in an other-the-counter supplement in 2015.

Exactly. With as many warnings as have been issued by WADA and others about supplements (tainted or otherwise) pro athletes are going to be extremely diligent about what they ingest. The fact that TD tweeted about investigating his supplements, rather than just saying "the findings are simply wrong" makes me think there's about a zero chance innocence.

2015, you can buy supplements that are certified WADA compliant.
http://www.bscg.org/supplement-information/

They aren't the only ones offering this service...

So does every supermarket, in the produce section.
 
Mar 18, 2009
324
0
0
Re: Re:

I searched for a USADA press release and found none. How they word this positive is key to his Danielson's defense and gives insight to USADA's intent. If, for example, he failed a random out of competition test, then the press release will be worded something like, "Danielson had an adverse analytical finding for testosterone or testosterone precursors," and a supplement PR campaign can commence. But if it's worded, "Danielson tested positive for testosterone," then that's a whole different thing. There is a test that isolates testosterone from its precursors but USADA rarely uses it because it cost more.
 
Re:

Benotti69 said:
I find Gaimon's reaction very disappointing

"Optum Pro Cycling’s Phil Gaimon, who recently wrote an article for Cyclingnews about what it means to be a clean rider, was one of the riders who didn’t want to comment about Danielson, whom he considers a friend. An obviously shaken Gaimon simply told Cyclingnews before the stage that his worldview had been shattered."

Gaimon's "worldview has been shattered", what? Was he born yesterday? What an idiot! Did he not watch il Giro then or the TdF, does he not know all the former dopers are now running teams, working for teams, working for race organisers, coaching etc.........

Gaimon aint ***, is he? When i hear that crap i think, yep that is another doper talking.........
So what is wrong with his answer? So he cannot be disappointed or sad that his friend got popped?
Not everybody shares your opinion you know!
I know there is a lot of doping so no need to tell me, but your opinion is 100%. Even mechanics do it to keep up with the work.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Re: Re:

Escarabajo said:
Benotti69 said:
I find Gaimon's reaction very disappointing

"Optum Pro Cycling’s Phil Gaimon, who recently wrote an article for Cyclingnews about what it means to be a clean rider, was one of the riders who didn’t want to comment about Danielson, whom he considers a friend. An obviously shaken Gaimon simply told Cyclingnews before the stage that his worldview had been shattered."

Gaimon's "worldview has been shattered", what? Was he born yesterday? What an idiot! Did he not watch il Giro then or the TdF, does he not know all the former dopers are now running teams, working for teams, working for race organisers, coaching etc.........

Gaimon aint ***, is he? When i hear that crap i think, yep that is another doper talking.........
So what is wrong with his answer? So he cannot be disappointed or sad that his friend got popped?
Not everybody shares your opinion you know!
I know there is a lot of doping so no need to tell me, but your opinion is 100%. Even mechanics do it to keep up with the work.

Not sure how a guy who professes to be clean can be friends wth a guy who should never had made it to pro cycling without doping. That is wrong in the 1st place.

So he is friends because Danielson gave the old worn out myth that he had to on Armstrong's team, but if you look at Danielsons history guy only got to US pro through dope.

Friends with a cheater, how does that work? You are friends with people who cheat you? I aint!

As for the 100% doping, I do believe that it is the riders. Mechanics don't dope. They make take drugs but it is not considered doping. Paolini was out partying with Mechanics before TdF........PDM bus driver took drugs to keep awake to do his job......But yep teams need riders to perform, clean ones are not required.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Re:

red_flanders said:
So much chatter about whether it's this or that supplement, whether he was trying to peak for Utah, why would he do this so late in his career? Noise, IMO.

Isn't the far more likely scenario, which is supported by history, that he just happened to get popped for something he's been doing the whole time? The idea that the testing catches people the one time they do it is laughable.

THis^^^^

Fans need to wake up. Random positive doesn't mean rider randomly took a PED. Means the ADA won the doping lotto and caught someone.

Vaughters only alluded to Danielson blood doping at Discovery, but heck the guy is doing PEDS from way before, why stop, and these guys do more than blood dope. Go checkout what Jiminez admitted to using. So much stuff.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Re: Re:

gooner said:
Benotti69 said:
I find Gaimon's reaction very disappointing

"Optum Pro Cycling’s Phil Gaimon, who recently wrote an article for Cyclingnews about what it means to be a clean rider, was one of the riders who didn’t want to comment about Danielson, whom he considers a friend. An obviously shaken Gaimon simply told Cyclingnews before the stage that his worldview had been shattered."

Gaimon's "worldview has been shattered", what? Was he born yesterday? What an idiot! Did he not watch il Giro then or the TdF, does he not know all the former dopers are now running teams, working for teams, working for race organisers, coaching etc.........

Gaimon aint ***, is he? When i hear that crap i think, yep that is another doper talking.........

He's speaking in terms of his friendship with Danielson, not the whole sport in general.

Really, Does he only have one friend in the whole word so his "worldview has been shattered". That doesn't make sense.
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Re: Re:

The Hitch said:
Catwhoorg said:
Benotti69 said:
Catwhoorg said:
Alex Simmons/RST said:
8 years to life is the range available as the standard sanction.

The 18 months he got reduced for co-operation would be tacked on for sure, so probably 9.5 years is the minimum he is facing.

I actually think Danielson deserves a lifeban. He knew what the score was after the 'reasoned decision' yet continued to dope. I think Tygart should have made that a prerequisite of the riders who continued to race after the 'reasoned decision', that any testing positive faces a life ban.

The silence from Vaughter's twitter is deafening.

I fully agree with the bold.
He got a chance, a lifeline to remain in the sport despite cheating, then cheated again anyway.


Doesn't really matter at his age though.

Yes I think it does. If he gets a life ban he is lumped in with Armstrong. If he gets 8 year ban he gets to be a Tyler, George, Levi etc and gets to coach, granfondos etc....
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Re: Re:

Dear Wiggo said:
Benotti69 said:
I find Gaimon's reaction very disappointing

"Optum Pro Cycling’s Phil Gaimon, who recently wrote an article for Cyclingnews about what it means to be a clean rider, was one of the riders who didn’t want to comment about Danielson, whom he considers a friend. An obviously shaken Gaimon simply told Cyclingnews before the stage that his worldview had been shattered."

Gaimon's "worldview has been shattered", what? Was he born yesterday? What an idiot! Did he not watch il Giro then or the TdF, does he not know all the former dopers are now running teams, working for teams, working for race organisers, coaching etc.........

Gaimon aint ***, is he? When i hear that crap i think, yep that is another doper talking.........

Ironically, Gaimon admitted in his CN article to having low T and taking supps to correct it...

:rolleyes:

Yes, is that not 'performance enhancing'? It is in my opinion. Let the body recover naturally and if it cant in time then you are in the wrong sport if you are going to be clean!

I mean that kind of thinking has guys taking stuff thinking this aint doping, i am low, because they need to recover!!! No the body naturally recovers and if it doesn't hard luck buddy it is tough sport and only the those with the right constitutions and ability should be competing. Problem with PEDS is it gives ***** like Danielson a career they should never have had!
 
Re: Re:

gooner said:
Benotti69 said:
I find Gaimon's reaction very disappointing

"Optum Pro Cycling’s Phil Gaimon, who recently wrote an article for Cyclingnews about what it means to be a clean rider, was one of the riders who didn’t want to comment about Danielson, whom he considers a friend. An obviously shaken Gaimon simply told Cyclingnews before the stage that his worldview had been shattered."

Gaimon's "worldview has been shattered", what? Was he born yesterday? What an idiot! Did he not watch il Giro then or the TdF, does he not know all the former dopers are now running teams, working for teams, working for race organisers, coaching etc.........

Gaimon aint ***, is he? When i hear that crap i think, yep that is another doper talking.........

He's speaking in terms of his friendship with Danielson, not the whole sport in general.

That's how I understood it as well. More that his world view of trusting friends was shattered, not his world view of pro cycling.

...

And regarding his supplement use from the article, all that indicates to me is that he is just another gullible athlete in terms of believing what interventions will help or not. To me, there is nothing to imply doping, but that attitude of "My testosterone is low, I better take a supplement. Oh and by the way, I'm racing and training really hard right now. No way the two can be related though, a supplement should do the trick." puts him in the same group that thinks going vegan will help their athletic performance.

...

I wrote on some other threads in the past about athletes', especially young athletes' responsibility to know the culture. It's irresponsible for Talansky to be defending Lance: even if he was a childhood hero, Talansky should learn the sport before sticking is opinion out there. Same with TJVG getting motor paced: he should be learned enough of the sport to know that it is not a good idea. Naiveté is no excuse anymore.

But it's a very difficult talent development process in which to learn that. In the US, there is no scholastic leagues in High School (no school based teams like basketball or track), and the collegiate system is a club system. Collegiate teams only pick up athletes who weren't good enough for other sports, or wanted to make be a part of community. Only a few riders really represent a bike rider developed from a young age.

As such the process for learning the culture is really low-key, amateur, and informal. Reading Gaimon's book, his exposure/learning process to the culture of doping was being beaten by Mancebo, accidentally being diagnosed with asthma before a teammate made him wise, and then by change training with and thus getting to know what appeared to be a big, bad Postal doper of Danielson,only to realize he is a normal person.

Then, becoming the spokesman for his own cleanliness, he thought he knew enough, having been on the "inside", and build his personal brand and cult following under his idea of what the doping culture was. He gave/gives the impression that he really thought there was a clean generation.

To wrap it all up, my own "worldview" is that most people are idiots, not malicious. Gaimon, I believe, isn't being disingenuous when he says what he thinks, just that what he thinks is not 100% accurate. I meet soooo many athletes who are just wrong about things. Wrong ideas about training. Wrong ideas about nutrition. Wrong ideas about how to communicate with race directors or sponsors or coaches. I find that fan's assume that athletes have their *** together, when very few do. Think about your own coworkers, in whatever field: banking, waitressing, retail, software development, and how incompetent most of them are. They aren't bad people, just, they're not as good as outsiders would believe. Having the title of "x" gives an impression that they are an expert, but you really know them, and know that they're just regular people that make regular mistakes.

Athletes are the same people. So when I see Gaimon trying to clean up his own mess, it strikes me as just another regular dude who made a dumb decision. Same way I see dopers in the sport, regular dudes who did their job badly (i.e., getting caught).

Anyway. Off my soapbox now.
 
Re: Re:

Dear Wiggo said:
Benotti69 said:
I find Gaimon's reaction very disappointing

"Optum Pro Cycling’s Phil Gaimon, who recently wrote an article for Cyclingnews about what it means to be a clean rider, was one of the riders who didn’t want to comment about Danielson, whom he considers a friend. An obviously shaken Gaimon simply told Cyclingnews before the stage that his worldview had been shattered."

Gaimon's "worldview has been shattered", what? Was he born yesterday? What an idiot! Did he not watch il Giro then or the TdF, does he not know all the former dopers are now running teams, working for teams, working for race organisers, coaching etc.........

Gaimon aint ***, is he? When i hear that crap i think, yep that is another doper talking.........

Ironically, Gaimon admitted in his CN article to having low T and taking supps to correct it...

:rolleyes:

That was an interesting bit of rationalization he did in that article.
 
Sep 29, 2012
12,197
0
0
This is what I don't understand:

Gaimon: I have low T. I will take something in an attempt to correct that and increase my T levels
Danielson: I was pinged for doping years ago, my results increased post-alleged doping stoppage. I will take something in an attempt to increase my T levels

Gaimon: world view shattered

:confused:

He's speaking in terms of his friendship with Danielson, not the whole sport in general.

So Gaimon's "world view" is based on his friendship with one dodgy alleged ex doper?

That's a recipe for disaster.
 
Re:

Dear Wiggo said:
This is what I don't understand:

Gaimon: I have low T. I will take something in an attempt to correct that and increase my T levels
Danielson: I was pinged for doping years ago, my results increased post-alleged doping stoppage. I will take something in an attempt to increase my T levels

Gaimon: world view shattered

:confused:

He's speaking in terms of his friendship with Danielson, not the whole sport in general.

So Gaimon's "world view" is based on his friendship with one dodgy alleged ex doper?

That's a recipe for disaster.
I think we're taking his use of the word 'world' out of context. He could have been speaking in terms of 'his world' and having a great friend turn out to be one of the things that you hate most could be 'world shattering'. Remember also that (we) Americans tend to exaggerate.

I happen to like Phil Gaimon, that's obvious eh? I think he's a genuine guy that wears his heartstrings on his sleave. I think he wanted to really emphasize how much his buddy Tommy D let him down..
 
Re: Re:

Benotti69 said:
Escarabajo said:
Benotti69 said:
I find Gaimon's reaction very disappointing

"Optum Pro Cycling’s Phil Gaimon, who recently wrote an article for Cyclingnews about what it means to be a clean rider, was one of the riders who didn’t want to comment about Danielson, whom he considers a friend. An obviously shaken Gaimon simply told Cyclingnews before the stage that his worldview had been shattered."

Gaimon's "worldview has been shattered", what? Was he born yesterday? What an idiot! Did he not watch il Giro then or the TdF, does he not know all the former dopers are now running teams, working for teams, working for race organisers, coaching etc.........

Gaimon aint ***, is he? When i hear that crap i think, yep that is another doper talking.........
So what is wrong with his answer? So he cannot be disappointed or sad that his friend got popped?
Not everybody shares your opinion you know!
I know there is a lot of doping so no need to tell me, but your opinion is 100%. Even mechanics do it to keep up with the work.

Not sure how a guy who professes to be clean can be friends wth a guy who should never had made it to pro cycling without doping. That is wrong in the 1st place.

So he is friends because Danielson gave the old worn out myth that he had to on Armstrong's team, but if you look at Danielsons history guy only got to US pro through dope.

Friends with a cheater, how does that work? You are friends with people who cheat you? I aint!

As for the 100% doping, I do believe that it is the riders. Mechanics don't dope. They make take drugs but it is not considered doping. Paolini was out partying with Mechanics before TdF........PDM bus driver took drugs to keep awake to do his job......But yep teams need riders to perform, clean ones are not required.

Let me see if I have this straight: you don't know how anyone could be friends with someone they know to have committed a transgression like this or even a crime? How old are you? You would do well to reflect on your own transgressions over your life, however long that is, and dial back the righteous indignation a tad. I know this particular forum thrives on such thunderous and sweeping condemnations, but just reflect for a bit. I will wager you that all of us have committed transgressions a might bit more serious than whatever Mr. Danielson has done with regards to his racing career. Frankly, the other transgression that frequently gets put out there with regards to him and his life strikes me as infinitely more serious than this stuff.

It's a pity we can't channel all the interest and time many of you devote to this cause to something more substantial. I was considering global climate change, child sex slavery and homelessness, but how about we start with your own lives and then work up from there?
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Re: Re:

chiocciolis_calves said:
Benotti69 said:
Escarabajo said:
Benotti69 said:
I find Gaimon's reaction very disappointing

"Optum Pro Cycling’s Phil Gaimon, who recently wrote an article for Cyclingnews about what it means to be a clean rider, was one of the riders who didn’t want to comment about Danielson, whom he considers a friend. An obviously shaken Gaimon simply told Cyclingnews before the stage that his worldview had been shattered."

Gaimon's "worldview has been shattered", what? Was he born yesterday? What an idiot! Did he not watch il Giro then or the TdF, does he not know all the former dopers are now running teams, working for teams, working for race organisers, coaching etc.........

Gaimon aint ***, is he? When i hear that crap i think, yep that is another doper talking.........
So what is wrong with his answer? So he cannot be disappointed or sad that his friend got popped?
Not everybody shares your opinion you know!
I know there is a lot of doping so no need to tell me, but your opinion is 100%. Even mechanics do it to keep up with the work.

Not sure how a guy who professes to be clean can be friends wth a guy who should never had made it to pro cycling without doping. That is wrong in the 1st place.

So he is friends because Danielson gave the old worn out myth that he had to on Armstrong's team, but if you look at Danielsons history guy only got to US pro through dope.

Friends with a cheater, how does that work? You are friends with people who cheat you? I aint!

As for the 100% doping, I do believe that it is the riders. Mechanics don't dope. They make take drugs but it is not considered doping. Paolini was out partying with Mechanics before TdF........PDM bus driver took drugs to keep awake to do his job......But yep teams need riders to perform, clean ones are not required.

Let me see if I have this straight: you don't know how anyone could be friends with someone they know to have committed a transgression like this or even a crime? How old are you? You would do well to reflect on your own transgressions over your life, however long that is, and dial back the righteous indignation a tad. I know this particular forum thrives on such thunderous and sweeping condemnations, but just reflect for a bit. I will wager you that all of us have committed transgressions a might bit more serious than whatever Mr. Danielson has done with regards to his racing career. Frankly, the other transgression that frequently gets put out there with regards to him and his life strikes me as infinitely more serious than this stuff.

You think cheating people is not serious?

I do think it is serious.

I don't compare sporting fraud to child sex slavery, homelessness, climate change or many of the other serious issues affecting the world and its citizens. This is a cycling forum and a doping subforum.

Yes, let's reflect about a guy who would never be at this level if not for his cheating. Most of his adult life he has been cheating and keeping clean riders out of a chance at a career in the sport. It was Danielsons choice to cheat.
That Gaimon calls a known cheater a friend and a guy who didn't tell all about his doping, only the blood doping and that was by Vaughters, so Danielson let Vaughters do it. Hardly presents himslef as a guy who truly regretted his doping. Nah I am happy at the level of 'indignation' i am giving Danielson.

chiocciolis_calves said:
It's a pity we can't channel all the interest and time many of you devote to this cause to something more substantial. I was considering global climate change, child sex slavery and homelessness, but how about we start with your own lives and then work up from there?

Why get personal with people you don't know?

How do you know what people do or dont do with their time?

Plenty of ways to help others and also make a few comments on a forum.
 
Sep 29, 2012
12,197
0
0
Re: Re:

irondan said:
Dear Wiggo said:
This is what I don't understand:

Gaimon: I have low T. I will take something in an attempt to correct that and increase my T levels
Danielson: I was pinged for doping years ago, my results increased post-alleged doping stoppage. I will take something in an attempt to increase my T levels

Gaimon: world view shattered

:confused:

He's speaking in terms of his friendship with Danielson, not the whole sport in general.

So Gaimon's "world view" is based on his friendship with one dodgy alleged ex doper?

That's a recipe for disaster.
I think we're taking his use of the word 'world' out of context. He could have been speaking in terms of 'his world' and having a great friend turn out to be one of the things that you hate most could be 'world shattering'. Remember also that (we) Americans tend to exaggerate.

I happen to like Phil Gaimon, that's obvious eh? I think he's a genuine guy that wears his heartstrings on his sleave. I think he wanted to really emphasize how much his buddy Tommy D let him down..

But Tommy D is doing what Phil wants to do: increase his testosterone.

I dunno. Maybe it's just me that sees no difference between the two.

If I was taking something to increase my T and an ex-doper buddy of mine got pinged for taking exo T (ie for the same reason as I was taking something) I would go - huh you idiot.

Not: zomg the sky is falling!! the sky is falling!!

Sorry to harp on about it -- I will stop now.

Does anyone seriously believe Ryder won the Giro clean? Is that going to shatter Gaimon's world view as well if it ever sees the light of day?
 
Re: Re:

Benotti69 said:
You think cheating people is not serious?

I do think it is serious.

I don't compare sporting fraud to child sex slavery, homelessness, climate change or many of the other serious issues affecting the world and its citizens. This is a cycling forum and a doping subforum.

Yes, let's reflect about a guy who would never be at this level if not for his cheating. Most of his adult life he has been cheating and keeping clean riders out of a chance at a career in the sport. It was Danielsons choice to cheat.
That Gaimon calls a known cheater a friend and a guy who didn't tell all about his doping, only the blood doping and that was by Vaughters, so Danielson let Vaughters do it. Hardly presents himslef as a guy who truly regretted his doping. Nah I am happy at the level of 'indignation' i am giving Danielson.

Why get personal with people you don't know?

How do you know what people do or dont do with their time?

Plenty of ways to help others and also make a few comments on a forum.
First off, I want to point out that I'm in no way defending TD or condoning doping in the pro peloton.

Benotti, you keep saying Tom Danielson could not possibly be a pro if it wasn't for doping, but you have absolutely no proof at all to back that up. You have no idea if he had the talent to make it as a pro, nor do you for most other riders. You could say the same thing about almost every single rider in the pro peloton.

Move on already.

Question: If everyone in the World Tour is doping as you've said in public many times, who's Tom Danielson cheating?
 
Aug 6, 2011
738
0
0
Re: Re:

irondan said:
Benotti69 said:
keeping clean riders out of a chance at a career in the sport. .


Question: If everyone in the World Tour is doping as you've said in public many times, who's Tom Danielson cheating?

I'll save you some time waiting for Benotti's answer (not that I agree with Benotti's views): He was cheating the clean guys who would have had a chance becoming pro if only the current generation of cheaters would not have cheated.
 
Sep 29, 2012
12,197
0
0
Re: Re:

irondan said:
Question: If everyone in the World Tour is doping as you've said in public many times, who's Tom Danielson cheating?

Anyone just below WT who would like a crack at it.
 
Apr 20, 2012
6,320
0
0
Re: Re:

Dear Wiggo said:
irondan said:
Question: If everyone in the World Tour is doping as you've said in public many times, who's Tom Danielson cheating?

Anyone just below WT who would like a crack at it.
Agreed, after watching the Volta a Portugal those guys MUST get a chance in the wT.
 
Mar 18, 2009
324
0
0
Re:

red_flanders said:
So much chatter about whether it's this or that supplement, whether he was trying to peak for Utah, why would he do this so late in his career? Noise, IMO.

Isn't the far more likely scenario, which is supported by history, that he just happened to get popped for something he's been doing the whole time? The idea that the testing catches people the one time they do it is laughable.

The thing is, it easy peazy lemon squeezy to defeat a t:e ratio test with transdermal testosterone. There's something like a 2-hour glow window. A CIR is something like six hours. The chances of USADA getting that lucky? No way. Well, unless they hit the lottery of lotteries.

Look, I'm unimpressed with USADA reference the Reasoned Decision. What the DoJ didn't hand them was already public. But if they went after Tommy D, somehow calculated his glow window and hit it?

Impressive.
 
Re: Re:

WillemS said:
irondan said:
Benotti69 said:
keeping clean riders out of a chance at a career in the sport. .


Question: If everyone in the World Tour is doping as you've said in public many times, who's Tom Danielson cheating?

I'll save you some time waiting for Benotti's answer (not that I agree with Benotti's views): He was cheating the clean guys who would have had a chance becoming pro if only the current generation of cheaters would not have cheated.
It was a rhetorical question, not serious on my part. I was just pointing out to Benotti that he can't have it both ways. Riders are %100 doped, or dopers cheat clean riders. Can't be both.