The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
marinoni said:I was just checking out the website of one of Canada's sports networks(TSN). In the comment section after the Armstrong story I'd say it's 85-15 in favor of Lance. Just sad.
User Guide said:Ferrari Cadel or is there another one?
silverrocket said:I think it's a bad day for cycling in the short term (in the mainstream media our sport does not look very good today), but will result in much better days for cycling in the future. It's like taking one step backwards to finally allow us to take two steps forward.
Clemson Cycling said:Was he doping more than everyone else?
Cavalier said:Meeting Ferrari once in 2001 hardly means he's got issues or does one meeting mean that 4 years later he's still got the effects?![]()
marinoni said:I was just checking out the website of one of Canada's sports networks(TSN). In the comment section after the Armstrong story I'd say it's 85-15 in favor of Lance. Just sad.
Boeing said:"It is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." - Carl Sagan
"not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7....." Le Bron James
DirtyWorks said:Keep in mind there are companies that anyone can hire that offer blog commenting services. They hire a bunch of people to post some variations on an approved theme. Wonderboy's team is not above doing this. So, what's real commentary and what isn't? Very hard to know.
Finally, that's barely 24 hours into the first full news cycle. As the facts come out, I think it will be progressively more difficult for really passive viewers to hang onto the myth. And then there's the psychology of the news. Few are okay with admitting mistakes even to themselves, so switching from the yellow band faithful to an angered proletariat might take a while.
Maxiton said:If fact, not only are they not above doing it - doesn't LA have some partial ownership in one of those companies? Just thinking back on that huge chart Dim did.
Truth.
Hugh Januss said:One meeting that we know of, but Cadel scored the same 4 rating on the Passport suspicion chart that Lance got, so.............
Quack quack quack
SaxonUK said:Not particularly happy about todays news, never was a fan of Armstrong, but popular riders bring in much needed interest in the sport, and now the golden boy has been stripped of everything.
A good and bad day for cycling
Don't be late Pedro said:True though I get the impression this is only the start of the legal bills he is going to have to pay.
iZnoGouD said:truly regrettable and shameful what they are doing with him!
That really shows how much humans are too tiny and mediocre. Lance: IGNORE THEM!
The doping can make you win ONE race, IMPROVE a brand, but certainly DOES NOT BUILD 15 YEARS OF GLORY AND SUCCESSES IN SPORT.
benpounder said:I'm pointing out that if ASO uses USADA standards, then for a decade, no one won, only one or two finished second and only one or two finished third. Green and Polka Dot jerseys? Same problem.
If ASO acknowledges USADA standards, then they admit to allowing dopers to podium for years.
And if ASO strips LA, what are Giro and Vuelta organizers going to do? If USADA standards are adhered to, then we have over a decade where very few people podiumed at any GT (and major tours and Classics and semi-Classics for that matter).
Please note, I say this as someone who accepts the likelihood that Armstrong doped. I think virtually everyone doped from the early 90s to mid 2000s. I think all race organizers tried to turn a blind eye, even after the Festina affair. And I think it wasn't till Heras, Vino, Landis, Rico were conclusively busted that they finally decided to adhere to their own rules.
In other words, If they adopt USADA standards, they admit that that is, in fact, egg on their face, and that it has been there since last century.
onefastgear said:So what happens now with issues such as the SCA settlement? Can they go after him? Will they bother doing so?
I read somewhere that Nike is sticking by him, for now.
Benotti69 said:Until the stable is completely cleaned out it will always smell. Start with the biggest and then the rest.
UCI next. Anti-doping to an independent.
The fans should demand that the sport be cleaned out. Moaning about the damage this has done is not to solve the problem but prolong it.
Real fans of cycling have long recognised there is a doping problem in sports.
Crying that stripping and life time banning Armstrong wont change anything palys directly intot he hands of thse int he sport now who continue this corruptness.
Catching Armstrong sends out the strongest possible message to those who dope or are thinking of doping.