JMBeaushrimp said:
Exactly.
I can't help but thinking that Flandis is a whole less crazier (and potentially a whole lot craftier) than he's given credit for...
Pardon the butchery of grammar, I don't want Mac coming down on me with a lesson
Crazy or crafty may not be the correct choices in the multiple choice question here.
1. Goes to the Tour, we are now told, fully jacked, on the complete program.
2. Gets busted for testosterone.
3. Claims persecution, some kinda agenda, goes on every media outlet proclaiming innocence.
4. Fights his suspension with every tool at his disposal legally and otherwise.
5. sets up internet funding website to help with his innocence project.
5a. Makes a pathetic comeback on the bicycle, rides Battenkill.
6. Tries to get a ride on Bruyneel's team. Bruyneel and Lance wisely say no. 7. Tries to get entry into TOur of California and the organizers say no.
8. THreatens and tries to blackmail Lance and Bruyneel AS HE DID WITH GREG LEMOND about his childhood sexual abuse WHEN GREG wouldnt play along with him. Witness intimidation? Hello?!?!?
9. THen has a sudden change of heart and confesses to doping.
10. Implausibly and completely untruthfully claims he didnt do any testosterone in the Tour despite hard evidence that he did.
11. Drops a dime on Lance and Bruyneel for purely vindictive retribution plain and simple either 1. correctly claiming he know about their doping, dropping a dime on the guys who gave him his big shot at pro cycling or 2. falsely accusing them of things they never had done. Either way, a complete and total sh#tweasal.
Highlights reel:
Midnight drunk tweets
Race to the bottom
Fake twitter to harass Lance and Johan
threats to Greg and Lance (puts him in a unique category)
Summary: manipulative, unreliable, untruthful, exploitative, unpredictable, lies cheats and threatens as a pattern, sounds more like a sociopath to me.