• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Quintana??

Page 5 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Aug 31, 2012
7,550
3
0
Visit site
I'm waiting for some brand new accounts insisting that Quintana is clean because of rounder wheels or oval chain rings. Or perhaps Quintana did inferior w/kg than Froome today but won anyway.

Where are they?
 
Apr 7, 2015
656
0
0
Visit site
Re:

SeriousSam said:
I'm waiting for some brand new accounts insisting that Quintana is clean because of rounder wheels or oval chain rings. Or perhaps Quintana did inferior w/kg than Froome today but won anyway.

Where are they?
Not grimacing for two weeks gives you an extra 50 watts in the third week.
 
why, quintana is toooo-tally cleans of course. it is just astonishing that he has risen to stardom from the cycling hinterlands, what with no proper training and guidance.

also remember that it was froome who was dropped, which in sky logic simply means that he put out more power/kg than quintana did.
 
Apr 7, 2015
656
0
0
Visit site
Re:

meat puppet said:
why, quintana is toooo-tally cleans of course. it is just astonishing that he has risen to stardom from the cycling hinterlands, what with no proper training and guidance.

also remember that it was froome who was dropped, which in sky logic simply means that he put out more power/kg than quintana did.
Now that the other teams have learnt how to lower their watts as well, Sky is in trouble.
 
Apr 7, 2015
656
0
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

carton said:
meat puppet said:
it is just astonishing that he has risen to stardom from the cycling hinterlands, what with no proper training and guidance.
LOLZ. Yeah, Colombian climber on a Spanish team. Do they even have bikes there? Or hills?
Hills doesn't help when you can only afford to go downhill.
 
Mar 13, 2015
949
0
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

carton said:
Eagle said:
harryh said:
Eagle said:
Only the 3rd time it's been climbed, will be interesting to see his w/kg, after such a hard day racing still very impressive

Obviously well over 6W/kg: http://www.chronoswatts.com/watts/39/Toussuire
Wow, crazy performance
A little disagreement here. Gesink and Pinot's PMs should help. https://twitter.com/ammattipyoraily/status/624617169079263235
Might have been a tailwind vs headwind, still impressive considering the way the stage was ridden
 
Re: Re:

carton said:
Eagle said:
harryh said:
Wow, crazy performance
A little disagreement here. Gesink and Pinot's PMs should help. https://twitter.com/ammattipyoraily/status/624617169079263235
I think vetooo and chronoswatts use a different formula in watts estimates. This should explain the discrepancy. Vetooo also had Wiggins 2012 44:58 La Toussuire around 5,6w/kg if my memory serves, which would be quite consistent with a 5,7w/kg figure he proposed.

Which is indeed very fast, given how the stage was raced and that we are deep into the third week of the TDF.
 
Re: Re:

Escarabajo said:
bigcog said:
http://www.chronoswatts.com/watts/19/

Alpe D'huez

37 Nairo Quintana Colombie Tour de France 2013 (#18) 39'50 6.25 w/kg 426

Why hasn't this ET performance been mentioned ? lol
I have 6 watts / kg for that climb. Nowhere near the 6.25 that you have. It is the drafting a size that made the big difference. You have to account for that!!!

It's not me, it's one of the relied on sources for this site :D
 
Re: Re:

bigcog said:
Escarabajo said:
bigcog said:
http://www.chronoswatts.com/watts/19/

Alpe D'huez

37 Nairo Quintana Colombie Tour de France 2013 (#18) 39'50 6.25 w/kg 426

Why hasn't this ET performance been mentioned ? lol
I have 6 watts / kg for that climb. Nowhere near the 6.25 that you have. It is the drafting a size that made the big difference. You have to account for that!!!

It's not me, it's one of the relied on sources for this site :D
I get the 6.25 w/kg without the drafting. But you have to take that into account!